Resource:

Performance management after the annual appraisal

Written by CMI Insights Monday 14 November 2016

Millions of hours are wasted on sub-standard appraisals every year. Managers fret whether they've done the process right; appraisees feel demoralised. We take an in-depth look at three examples of next-generation performance management, and ask whether these are a better way to get the most out of your people.

Performance management is meant to improve your organisation’s output, but, more often than not, an ill-conceived and ill-suited process is put in place that does little more than waste time and demotivate your staff.

For years, managers across the globe have sat down with their staff once a year to review their performance and give them a rating based on a set of often arbitrary measures. Big Four accounting firm Deloitte found that its annual review process was taking two million hours to complete every year, including filling in forms, holding the actual reviews and creating ratings.
Read the full story: https://www.managers.org.uk/insights/news/2016/september/performance-management-after-the-annual-appraisal

Topic: Imposter Syndrome

“Professional accreditation really raises the bar on standards”

Adam McNall CMgr MCMI, Chartered Manager of the Week, had imposter syndrome, but learning with CMI helped his confidence

Read article
Topic:

Highlights – 10 December

Supporting apprentices, learning to listen and tackling change head-on

Read article
Topic:

Three errors managers make when striving for improvement

In a new book, Max McKeown explores how people can become superadaptive and transform constraints into opportunities

Read article
Topic: Personal Development

How I used passion and purpose to reshape a university department

A mix of clarity, curiosity and confidence helped a fragmented department find its focus – and a fresh sense of purpose

Read article